Friday, August 8, 2008

Funkadelic- "Maggot Brain" (Eddie Hazel)

Available on: Maggot Brain (1971)
Solo Bits: 1:15-10:19


Making "Maggot Brain" my inaugural choice, my candidate for solo par excellence, was not as hard a decision as I thought it might be. In actuality, it was the only logical place I could start, for several reasons. First and primary among them is that I know this song (as well as the rest of the album) inside and out as a result of a failed attempt at writing a biography of Eddie Hazel a few years back. Also, it is a very long and intense solo that's well-regarded by guitarists of all stripes, particularly by Hendrix acolytes, 80's indie rockers (it was once covered by J. Mascis & The Fog with Mike Watt), and alternative jam bands (Ween wrote a tribute to Hazel entitled "A Tear For Eddie," that did a decent job of imitating the hypnotic qualities of Hazel's playing). It's also probably singlehandedly responsible for Hazel's reputation, which is unfair considering his playing was always excellent, but at least it's the kind of thing that gets Funkadelic noticed in outlets like Rolling Stone. And what's more, the song is nothing more than extended guitar solo, bookended by brief monologues from George Clinton.

It's kind of a famous story in P-funk lore, and, for once, the evidence shows that the incident in question probably happened: after working out the basic idea for the track, George Clinton told Eddie Hazel to, "Play like your mama just died," and he did exactly that (Eddie's mother Brenda is still alive, by the way, and is the executor of his estate as well as responsible for distributing Eddie posthumous jam recordings). For the ten minutes and eighteen seconds that constitute this track, Eddie Hazel attacks, commands, and distorts one's emotions in a way only few artists can claim to do. Throughout the rest of his recording career, going up through his solo album Games, Dames, & Guitar Things (which I recommend if you can get a copy from Rhino), he would contribute uniformly excellent guitar leads, alternately dazzling in their technical ability and emotionally gut-wrenching, yet in the end it all comes down to "Maggot Brain." Few artists have been so defined by one book, or one painting, or one movie, let alone one ten-minute electric guitar solo. It is his ultimate triumph and, considering his later output, his tragedy.

The only instruments heard on this song, other than guitar, are a muted keyboard and an occasional, reverb-heavy snare hit. As far as I know, it is as austere a recording as had been yet attempted by George Clinton, a far cry from the sort of work he would do later, with 40+ members on stage at any given time, including the guy that works the flashlight. When Eddie's guitar comes in at 1:14, it sounds tired, dismissive. He plays small clusters of notes, leaving gaps where one recognizes how empty the recording sounds without his guitar front and center. He starts playing faster, slowly piling on the effects. Within the next five minutes he goes through all the stages of grieving for his lost mother: anger, denial, helplessness, acceptance. His guitar sounds, at different times, like it's crying, screaming, talking, laughing. At points he starts playing incredibly fast clusters of notes, as if losing control of his mind or his ability to live, but then pulls back, anchoring what few notes he plays in a wash of reverb. Like Hendrix, Hazel's playing runs counter to the notion of masturbatory satisfaction that came to typify guitarists of succeeding decades (even the good ones). It sounds like a genuine attempt at exorcism.

The little echoes you hear (or at least think you hear), make you feel things long after they have actually been played, but then at a certain point the other instruments drop out completely. Eddie keeps playing, employing more of what would stereotypically be called "funk" playing (palm-muting, rigorous rhythyms), which is funny given that he has no rhythm section to work off of. The result is an emotional lull. He's not hitting the high notes he normally hits, which means maybe he's in the middle of pondering something, or maybe he's in denial. In any case, in a jarring move, the back instruments come back, and Eddie is back where he started.

During the early reign of Funkadelic, this would be Eddie's solo showcase onstage, where he would emerge from a manufactured purple fog dressed in some garish pimp's outfit with a Les Paul guitar, letting all the manufactured pain bubble for the crowd to drink up. He would look intently at his guitar and move his head, cringing and bobbing along with what he was playing. Who knows what was going through his head when he played it? I was never able to see him play the song live, so I will never know firsthand what sort of reactions he could wring out of people by playing certain notes, but I know he could make people cry, and there's a short list of guitarists who could do that.

Critics of popular music tend to throw around the word "virtuoso" pretty liberally when referring to musical artists of a particular expressive power. Certainly Eddie Hazel is often tagged with this admittedly well-intentioned compliment, but doing so does a disservice to the amount of craft and imagination he was able to put into his playing. Eddie Hazel was no "virtuoso," at least not by the terms that virtuosity is often defined (like most rhythm & blues guitarists of the time, he was not one to notate his music, nor was he likely to play lightning fast scalar solos or indulge in fret-tapping)--he was simply a blues guitarist, and the more one looks at the Steve Vais and Joe Satrianis of the world, the more it becomes abundantly clear that blues playing has nothing to do with virtuosity. I don't think I'm generalizing when I say that electric blues playing has never been about playing fast or effortlessly--on the contrary, it's about striving, sweating, desperately searching for some sort of truth or happiness in the form of a well-placed note, upon which the blues player realizes that this note is far from perfect, and the journey must continue. The tone of melancholy that pervade 99% of guitar blues is, at its basest level, the guitarist struggling to achieve transcendence, possibly as a way of communicating with his or her audience, possibly as a way of keeping the hell hound temporarily off the trail.

I run the risk of not being sufficiently specific. On a purely technical level, and Hazel is as perfect an example as one can think of, blues guitarists often use fairly simple patterns and often involve the same notes played over and over again. What gives the guitar a special edge over many blues instruments is that, as a string instrument, it allows the player to bend the string and therefore slightly change the pitch, which simultaneously provides the player with two advantages: first, it can give the note a more interesting "crying" tone, moving the pitch back and forth as if it was a weeping baby, and second, it allows the guitarist to cover up for any mistake by bending the note to a more pleasing pitch. From the earliest delta blues records to Led Zeppelin, even untrained ears can pick up moments on studio albums where the guitarist flubs a note and quickly covers it up by bending it or moving it back to the original note.

Professional musicians wouldn't like to admit it, but it's pretty easy for even a novice guitarist to play a convincingly "bluesy" solo if he sticks to the same three or four notes in a particular pattern (I submit Lynyrd Skynyrd's "Freebird" as the absolute nadir of bendy three-note solos). But in the end, it's not about that. Great blues guitarists have personality and vocabulary that they make their own--they might play the same three notes over and over, but it's three notes that no one else would play in that particular way at that particular time. There's a reason one can tell that it's clearly Hazel and not fellow Funkadelic guitarist Michael Hampton playing the solo on, say, "Red Hot Mama," and it comes down to the fact that listeners learn to notice the particular choices that great, unique guitarists can make, even on the dime.

Eddie Hazel was a master and should continue to be respected as such. His later drug addiction didn't really do him any favors, and I think he could have exceeded "Maggot Brain" had he not become so dependent, but who knows? "Maggot Brain" is as austere, thoughtful, and emotionally riveting as any extended solo I have ever heard.

Wednesday, August 6, 2008

An introduction for those in need

Hello.

The title of this blog should be self-explanatory, but for those who want some sort of road map, I'll oblige. I am a 21-year old student, writer and musician who can usually be found posting here, on a variety of subjects ranging from politics and religion and mathematics to music and art. The purpose of this blog is a bit more specialized. I have considered myself a connoisseur of the many dimensions that a guitar solo can take: as a philosophical rejoinder to a song's melodic or lyrical content; as an expression of creative virtuosity; as an attempt at achieving new and previously unattainable levels of expression; as an opportunity to mess with structure or melody, to "kick out the jams," if you will, the guitar solo is a malleable creature that remains as relevant to the art of music-making as ever. Plainly put, there are just some that I like listening to a lot, for a bevy of different reasons. This blog is intended as a celebration presented in periodic essays.

Structurally, it's pretty simple: I will generally focus on one song, and more particularly the guitar solo within that song. The art of soloing is something I don't think is written about very often, or at least very well. You can read about the latest meathead rocker or classic rock relic talking about their tuneless and exhibitionistic wonking in articles and interviews with Guitar World and (the slightly less offensive) Guitar Player magazine, but all they do is basically teach aspiring worthless guitar showoffs to play exactly like whatever 70's icon or flavor of the month is on the cover (I mean, seriously, how many times can they put Jimmy Page on the damn thing?). I plan to try something more authentic. I have a reasonably strong background in music theory as well as critical theory; additionally, I was a guitarist and songwriter in my own band, and I've played a few solos in my time, so I have some idea of what it's like to pull off something fantastic. Conversely, I know what it's like to sink like a dead weight when one's ideas outstretch one's technical ability, and vice versa. You shouldn't expect anything written here to be too esoteric, but occasionally I might get caught up in some subject that you might find to be less than relevant to the matter at hand. Such is the ineffable nature of music.

I will take careful consideration as to what constitutes a guitar solo, and occasionally I may have arguments with myself as well as others as to what qualifies as a full-blown solo and what is merely a longish guitar riff or something else entirely. I believe it's fairly well-established that guitar solos can be both scrupulously pre-written (as was the standard practice of Pink Floyd guitarist David Gilmour, who devised many of his solos first as vocal melodies) and completely off the cuff (as was the case, apparently, with Eric Clapton's "Sunshine of Your Love" solo, as well as a lot of punks like Johnny Thunders), so the notion of the guitar solo being completely an improvised art is pretty much a dead one. Yet, other questions can muddy things a bit. What about something like Joey Santiago's brief interlude in the Pixies' "Hey"? What about Johnny Ramone's solo for "I Wanna Be Sedated," which according to Slate is the same note played 65 times? Surely, there's no rule as to how many notes a solo needs to be in order to qualify, nor is there any specified length. Yet, I wouldn't argue that, say, the last few seconds of Prince's "I Could Never Take the Place of Your Man" wouldn't qualify, being the same note played twice. Additionally people will sometimes talk about Robert Fripp's "chord solos," which barely count in my book, but who knows? What about when two guitarists try soloing at the same time? Does it count as "a solo"? What about the occasional bass solo (I may talk about one I particularly love, from Blondie's "Atomic")? These are all questions I will have to wrestle with. I hope I am up to the challenge, and I hope that people here will try disagreeing with me.

I will choose, I admit, from a very hegemonic and male-oriented pool of guitar pioneers. However, don't expect me to feature typical meathead "rawk" songs. While there's no way I can go about this blog without discussing the holy trinity of Jimmy Page, Jeff Beck, and Eric Clapton (although you can expect severe criticisms of Clapton to be leveled, particularly post-1970) I don't think it is necessary to devote one iota of processing power to that wildly overinflated and overplayed "Freebird" solo. While many may think that Van Halen's "Eruption" is among the greatest guitar solos ever, I would much sooner include more esoteric choices from the Vibrators, the Band, John McLaughlin, Built To Spill, and Public Image Ltd. Expect me to do a lot of genre-crossing, particularly in the areas of funk (with indisputable greats like Prince and Eddie Hazel, the latter of whom will be the subject of my first real post), folk (Richard Thompson) and even rap music (Outkast's "B.O.B." counts!). Similarly, expect me to consider recent music as well as music from classic rock's heyday, and I may even dip my toes into earlier 50's music as well. I think, however, I will limit myself to only covering stuff written after the advent of the electric guitar. This is not a Guitar World-sanctioned blog by any means, and expect me to talk a lot of shit about onanist guitar icons like Steve Vai and Yngwie Malmsteen. I will probably have little, if anything, to say about them. On the other hand, I will probably talk about Zappa a lot.

This should be a fun exercise. Critics don't talk about solos a lot, but for a lot of us they hold a particular expressive power which is alien to most segments of the population that prefer more immediate and obvious pleasures; with that in mind, I dedicate this blog to the brave guitarists that took the instrument one step further, courting controversy and making enemies along the way, but ultimately emerging successful and inspiring millions. To them, and to those who love them, is this blog meant for.